ERM Implementation Team
Culshaw, Fong, Helgoth, Jobe, Wakimoto
agreed to join the ERM implementation committee.
committee will be co-chaired by Fong and Jobe while Wicht is on family
Wakimoto is new to the committee, members of the group gave a brief
overview of progress to date.
committee discussed a proposal brought by Baia to form smaller sub-groups and
include others who work with e-resources.
After the discussion, the sense of the group was that it needed to
formulate a work plan and a timeline before forming sub-groups. Once the committee has been able to
identify the relevant issues, it could form sub groups to solicit feedback.
agreed to add a links for ERM library catalogs and for the DLF Federation http://www.library.cornell.edu/cts/elicensestudy/
the ERM page. Fong will send the
links. Catalogs that the committee
has examined include: U. of
Washington, Ohio State, Bowling
Green, New York
State, the University of Technology, Sydney, and others.
will ask Callahan to start exploring wwwoptions for ERM. It may be that the Libraries can examine
some of the public display issues from Chinook’s staging area.
committee discussed plans for an ERM update session. Issues that may be covered include:
definition of ERM
explanation of the process
ERM (the context)
work of the committee to date
for sample records
record structure chart (relationships between resource, license, and
solutions vs. CASE
process at other Universities.
that we are experimenting and learning—at the beginning of a long
implementation path. We haven’t reached a point where we are making decisions
that might impact workflows. When
we do all affected will be involved. Talk about the lack of
standardization in this area. In
the absence of standards, the committee is examining best practices.
date: October 26, 2:00 pm.
committee plans to continue planning for the session at its next meeting
on October 12. Baia and Culshaw
won’t be able to make that meeting.
Culshaw will also be out on the 19th.